<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are we getting crazier? What do the MMPI norms say about that?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mmpi-info.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=20" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mmpi-info.com/blog/?p=20</link>
	<description>News and Information on the MMPI-2 and PDM</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 05:53:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rmgordonphd</title>
		<link>http://www.mmpi-info.com/blog/?p=20&#038;cpage=2#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>rmgordonphd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 02:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.120.151.7/~rmgordon/blog/?p=20#comment-4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ken
It seems that we just can&#039;t get enough scales that measure bias, since it is such a complex and important problem.  Friedman, Lewark, Nichols and Webb (2001) &quot;Psychological Assessment with the MMPI-2&quot; is a good source and will provide you with the references you need. L, F and K are great scales. After that- Wiggins Sd, S, So-r (Edwards) and Nichols and Green&#039;s Other Deception (Od) show incremental validity over L and K (p.55). However, the best measures of bias often are not from more scales but revealed by the motives, documents and clinical and collateral interviews.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken<br />
It seems that we just can&#8217;t get enough scales that measure bias, since it is such a complex and important problem.  Friedman, Lewark, Nichols and Webb (2001) &#8220;Psychological Assessment with the MMPI-2&#8243; is a good source and will provide you with the references you need. L, F and K are great scales. After that- Wiggins Sd, S, So-r (Edwards) and Nichols and Green&#8217;s Other Deception (Od) show incremental validity over L and K (p.55). However, the best measures of bias often are not from more scales but revealed by the motives, documents and clinical and collateral interviews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken OReilly</title>
		<link>http://www.mmpi-info.com/blog/?p=20&#038;cpage=1#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken OReilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.120.151.7/~rmgordon/blog/?p=20#comment-3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi I am a Clinical Psychologist working in Ireland and I am wondering how to get the items for Wiggins Social Desirability Scale and Nichols and Greenes Other Deception Scale. I have heard they are very good in forensic contexts as they are less easily influenced by coaching than traditional validity scales. I have search recent journal articles alas but to no avail. Can you help? Many Thanks Ken]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi I am a Clinical Psychologist working in Ireland and I am wondering how to get the items for Wiggins Social Desirability Scale and Nichols and Greenes Other Deception Scale. I have heard they are very good in forensic contexts as they are less easily influenced by coaching than traditional validity scales. I have search recent journal articles alas but to no avail. Can you help? Many Thanks Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
